If you have tried to run any type of frequency analysis on an assembly, you may have noticed that the only types of contact conditions available to you are Bonded and Free. The No Penetration contact condition is not available. The reason for this is that constant stiffness and mass matrices are a requirement for frequency analysis. No Penetration allows components to come together or to separate during the course of an analysis which would represent a change in the stiffness matrix. This also precludes the use of bolt connectors in an assembly frequency analysis as bolt connectors utilize No Penetration contact conditions.
There are two methods around this. The first is to replace the bolt connectors with bonded contacts at the necessary locations. The second option is to apply free contact between the connected components and utilizing pin connectors. The first method generally makes the model overly rigid resulting in higher than actual natural frequencies. The second method leans the other way. While these methods do not provide completely accurate results, they typically bound the true frequencies.
P.S. This is also the case for Modal Time History, Harmonic, and Random Vibration Linear Dynamic analysis. As stated above, Bonded and Free contacts are also typically suitable assumptions in these cases as well.
|
|
Seth Bischoff |


Jimmy: I always try to attend the 3DVision “What’s new” presentations, but this year I wasn’t allowed to go. Isn’t it interesting that companies offer tuition reimbursement but won’t let you take a half day to attend a What’s New presentation? They’d pay for me to take a pottery class (as long as I get a “C” or better) but they won’t help me keep my SolidWorks skills current?
Take this man Jimmy. Jimmy is the top gun engineer at his company. Last night Jimmy’s IT department upgraded his SolidWorks installation from SolidWorks 2008 to 2009. Let’s watch to see how much faster Jimmy is with the new upgrade.
