Posts Tagged ‘Training’

Divergence and Convergence for Simulation Results

Friday, April 22nd, 2011

Divergence in a model  leads to a stress quantity that continually increases as the user refines the mesh globally or in areas of localized high stress.  Divergence is typically encountered when the load transfer concentrates in the geometry at a sharp corner. The stress will continue to rise based on its own definition;
 
Stress=Force/Area
 
With a sharp corner the area becomes, zero.  This drives the stress value upwards with each new, tighter mesh. In manufacturing a perfect edge does not exist. All modern manufacturing methods will create small fillets.  The fillet helps transfer the load over a larger area hence eliminating the stress concentration. 

4-22-2011 8-49-13 AM

Lets Discuss Convergence In a Simulation Model:

In Finite Element Analysis (FEA) the results are an approximation.  The way a user becomes comfortable with the stress, strain, and deflection calculated by an analysis depends on convergence.  A recommended variation of 5% stress between runs usually indicates good stress convergence.

To reach convergence a user can apply multiple methods, over the course of their analysis studies.

Global Mesh Refinement

The Global mesh refinement method indicates that a user over the course of three or four studies tightens the global mesh size incrementally until the calculated results are within the users specified convergence range.

    Plus: Easy to adjust the setting of global mesh size.

Minus: Larger run times due to areas of low stress having the mesh refined as well.  The more elements in the Finite Element Model the longer the computing time.Mesh Control

Mesh control allows a user to specify mesh refinement in localized areas of high stress leaving the global mesh density larger.  This is the recommended method.

    Plus: Allows user more control over the mesh in areas of high stress. Keeps computation time shorter as only areas of interest are being refined.

Minus: This takes more time to setup and identify areas to add mesh control.Adaptive Meshing (H Method)

Adaptive meshing allows the users to apply “mesh cruise control”.  Simulation looks for convergence based on parameters the user specifies, usually a target accuracy for the Strain Energy Norm.  Simulation automatically adds mesh control in areas of calculated high stress. It is important that the original mesh starts at default settings, and it is recommended this method be used with standard meshing. Five iterations is usually a good starting point.  Note that H Adaptive is only run once, as the software completes the mesh refinement and runs for you.  Remember that if the target accuracy is not achieved, you can re-run the H-adaptive study again and it will continue from the last iteration.

    Plus: Simulation automates the process.

Minus: Additional analysis setup time is required.When adding mesh control or mesh refinement always take small steps.  Mesh density should be adjusted in small increments. For example if a mesh control starts at 0.25″ the next change would be 0.2″.  We generally recommend a 20% reduction in mesh size with each successive analysis for applied mesh controls.

Let’s discuss Standard versus Curvature based mesh:

The Standard Mesh has been used from the beginning of SolidWorks Simulation.  The Standard mesher uses the Voronoi-Delaunay meshing scheme for subsequent meshing operations. The Standard mesher incorporates a global size that reads the thinnest area of the component and dictates at minimum cross section at least two elements define the thickness in the mesh.  This may lead to mesh refinement  in areas that may not be required.  Manual mesh control can then be applied to refine specified areas.

The Curvature based mesh creates more elements in higher-curvature areas automatically (without the need to apply mesh controls).  Typically curvature based meshes do not need additional user applied mesh controls, and take less steps to achieve convergence.

Mesh Quality

The output from any simulation is mesh dependent.  An analysis of a model with a  good quality mesh will have different answers than the same model with a poor quality mesh. It is always important to look at the mesh plot and investigate the aspect ratio of the mesh.  Aspect ratio is a measure of the skew of an element, defined as the ratio of the longest edge/ shortest edge.  For a high Quality element, the Aspect Ratio should be less than 3.  Overall 85% to 90% of the elements in a mesh should have an Aspect Ratio of less than 3. A high Aspect Ratio will cause higher stress to be calculated in that element than surrounding cells.

Robert Warren

Robert Warren
Application Support Engineer
CSWP / CSWST / CSWI / CSPST
3DVision Technologies

Dynamic Clearance-Worth the Price of Admission

Friday, March 18th, 2011

In Essentials class this week, one of the attendees was very impressed with the Dynamic Clearance option available when using ‘Move Component’ in an assembly.  He commented that neither he nor the few other Engineers and Designers he works with knew about this functionality.  Considering this attendees’ company designs and manufactures non-static equipment, I am somewhat surprised.

As a refresher, the Dynamic Clearance option is available when using ‘Move Component’ on the Assembly Command Manager tab.  After you select ‘Move Component’, you have several options.  As you can see from the screen capture, I have selected the male and female yoke as the two components that I’m interested in knowing the Dynamic Clearance between.  Once I have selected the components and clicked the ‘Resume Drag’ button, I select a mobile component of the assembly and start to move it.  This dimension in the graphics window represents the current minimum clearance between the components I selected.  Also, you should note that in the Property Manager window, the dialog at the bottom of Dynamic Clearance provides an indication of the minimum clearance between the components, shown as [min = 0.079], as soon as you start to drag/move components.  Then all you have to do is watch your on-screen feedback to move the components to that closest position.

Now that you’ve added a new tool to your arsenal, take a look at some of your movable assemblies and see if you have less clearance between components than you thought.  As another Essentials attendee commented, not all of our minimum clearance conditions occur in our orthogonal views!  For him, the Dynamic Clearance functionality was “worth the price of admission”.   I hope the rest of the class was, too!
2011-0317 Dynamic Clearance

Bill Reuss

Bill Reuss, CSWE
Application Support Engineer
3DVision Technologies

3DVision’s SWW Presentations

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

Didn’t get to make the trip to San Antonio to see our SolidWorks World presentations live?  Or maybe you did, but you loved them so much you want to watch them over and over again like Cosby episodes?  Well, either way, you’re in luck because all the presentations have been posted along with the file sets that went with them right here:

http://www.3dvision.com/swwpresentations

Enjoy!

Jordan Tadic
Application Engineer, CSWE
3DVision Technologies
follow me @TadicWorks

What’s New in SolidWorks 2011 Video

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010

As we’ve been doing for the last few years, we’ve posted a video presenting all of what’s new in SolidWorks 2011.  Whether you weren’t able to make it to one of the local live events or you’d like to pass it on to your colleagues so they’ll be able to review all the new details as well, it’s available by clicking the link below.

whats-new-2011

Jordan Tadic
Application Engineer, CSWE
3DVision Technologies
follow me @TadicWorks

Need Replaced?

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

You have a design change come in and you find out you need to replace one part in some assemblies. So how do you replace it? Do you delete the component, delete the mates and put in the new component in with new mates? WRONG…this takes way too long especially if you have multiples to replace in the assembly.
You should be using the “Replace Components” tool. It’s easy and does a lot for you.

  1. Right click on the component in the graphic area or on in the FeatureManager Design Tree.
  2. Now choose “Replace Components”. This component is added to the selection box of components to replace.
  3. Select the “Browse…” button and find the component that is doing the replacing.
  4. Under Options, make sure you select Re-attach mates. This is what saves the time. Also, if you want to replace all the instances, checkmark the box “All instances” which is under the top selection box.

Replace

So now you clicked OK and you have a selection box on the left, a preview box with the old component in it, a little toolbar with “isolate” on it, and the assembly has the new component in it. Now what?

  1. The preview window shows a face selected/highlighted. Select the same face on the new component in the assembly.
  2. Doing this puts a green checkmark on the left.
  3. Now either flip the alignment or move to the next red question mark.
  4. If you can’t get to the required face or can’t tell what face to select, rotate the assembly and you will see the preview rotate too. You can also click in the preview window and rotate the model.

Replace Mates

There you go a new tool that makes replacing components very easy.

Josh Spencer

Josh Spencer
Application Engineer
3DVision Technologies

Free Solo training with a live instructor

Friday, September 10th, 2010

I’m a big fan of tutorials, but they cannot beat a live instructor.

Sign up to take the free DriveWorks Solo Training Class. This online LIVE class is delivered by a DriveWorks Solo Technical Specialist.

They have the class broken down into three, one hour sessions on September 27, 28 & 29th.

Download your free 30 day Solo trial and take the training class. This is a very low risk way to discover how you can save money using DriveWorks Solo.

Jeff Sweeney

Jeff Sweeney
Engineering Data Specialist
3DVision Technologies

Rivera learns of training in Capone’s Enterprise Vault

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

My original plan was to have Geraldo Rivera take over today’s blog, but he claims he can no longer type since his nose was broken, so I’ll continue with the narration.

Okay Geraldo, what does the next tab look like in Capone’s item master?

“Well Engineering Data Specialist Man, it appears Capone had an extensive training program. Many of his training documents have an item card associated with them to track who has actually reviewed each document. In the past, I’ve seen some elaborate workflows created to accomplish the same thing but I have to remark using the item master to track this information certainly simplifies the process.”

signoffcard
Clever indeed Geraldo, what else can we find in Al Capone’s Enterprise Vault? …

Jeff Sweeney

Jeff Sweeney
Engineering Data Specialist
3DVision Technologies

WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera